ECJ holds that transferees are not bound by post-transfer changes to collectively agreed terms of employment
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has held that a transferee was not bound by post-transfer collectively agreed terms of employment. It was held that European law precluded UK courts from adopting a ‘dynamic’ rather than a ‘static’ interpretation of TUPE; put another way: transferees are bound by the collectively agreed terms in force at the date of transfer, but not by any subsequent collectively agreed terms (Alemo-Herron & Ors v Parkwood Leisure Ltd).
In this case, the claimants argued that their new employer, Parkwood Leisure, was bound by collectively agreed terms negotiated after the transfer date. Under their contracts of employment with their original employer, the London Borough of Lewisham, they benefited from terms ‘in accordance with collective agreements negotiated from time to time by the National Joint Council for Local Government [NJC]’. The NJC negotiated a new collective agreement relating to pay after the transfer date and the claimants argued that they were entitled to a pay increase in line with this new agreement. Parkwood refused to abide by the new NJC terms and the claimants brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence has altered the approach that courts will take when considering whether to grant injunctive relief or damages.
Data & Information E-Alerts — nuisance calls action plan; £50,000 fine for unlawful calls; simpler security classifications; and more
Addleshaw Goddard has released the 4 April 2014 edition of its Data & Information E-Alerts publication.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.