EAT upholds costs award of £87,000 against unrepresented claimant
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld an employment tribunal’s decision to make a costs award of around £87,000 against an unrepresented claimant of limited means, despite the fact that no deposit order had been made and no costs warning had been issued (Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham).
Addleshaw Goddard reported on this case earlier in the year, following the EAT’s decision to uphold an employment tribunal’s refusal to allow the claimant to admit covert recordings during the proceedings on the basis that she was unable to demonstrate why they were relevant. More recently, the EAT has considered the second part of the claimant’s appeal against the employment tribunal’s decision – the decision to make a costs award against her of around £87,000.
Generally, costs do not ‘follow the event’ in employment tribunals (i.e. the losing party does not normally pay the winning party’s costs). However, employment tribunals do have the discretion to make costs awards where, in their opinion, a party has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively or otherwise unreasonably in the proceedings, or where the party’s case is misconceived (which includes a party ‘having no reasonable prospect of success’). If an employment tribunal decides to exercise this discretion, they may have regard to that party’s ability to pay…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Court of Appeal in Versloot Dredging BV v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherang AG has made it clear that where an insured uses a ‘fraudulent device’, it will forfeit the entire claim.
Up to Date: shared parental leave — our detailed guide to the new system; making sense of holiday pay; and more
Addleshaw Goddard has released the November 2014 edition of its Up-to-Date publication on employment law and developments.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?