EAT holds that the mental processes of anyone influencing a decision maker should be taken into account
In Reynolds v CLFIS (UK) Ltd and others, the claimant alleged that the termination of her consultancy agreement was discriminatory on the grounds of age. The employment tribunal (ET) dismissed the claim on the basis that the person who took the decision to terminate did so on the basis of the claimant’s performance and this decision was not tainted by age discrimination. However, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the ET was wrong to focus only on the mental processes of the decision maker in circumstances where it was common ground that other individuals had significantly influenced the decision. The ET should have examined the mental processes of those individuals as well.
When considering discrimination claims, ETs must assess what are the grounds for the treatment in question. Where the act itself is not inherently discriminatory, it can be rendered discriminatory by the conscious or unconscious motivations that led to the act.
In this case, the claimant, Dr Reynolds, had worked as the chief medical officer for the respondent under a consultancy agreement since 2006 (prior to this, she had been employed by the respondent for more than 20 years). In 2010, when the claimant was 73 years of age, the respondent’s UK general manager took the decision to terminate the consultancy agreement with the claimant, essentially on grounds of performance. The UK general manager reached this decision after he had listened to a presentation, delivered by two of the respondent’s employees, which had highlighted a number of deficiencies in the services provided by the claimant…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
InCredit — new rules on credit broking fees and financial promotions; FCA webpage on rules for loan-based crowdfunding platforms; CML responds on FPC direction powers
This edition includes new rules on credit broking fees, the Q3 SME lending stats and the European Banking Authority’s thoughts on credit institutions.
InCredit – FCA structural changes; speech by CEO of Competition & Markets Authority; PRA update on implementing BRRD; and more
Addleshaw Goddard’s weekly publication provides information on current retail finance issues, regulatory and legislative developments, market watch and ASA adjudications.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?