EAT decision: workers have free choice of companions at disciplinary and grievance meetings
By Kevin McCavish
A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) demonstrates the latitude that employers must give workers in choosing companions to accompany them at disciplinary and grievance meetings.
Under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 (ERA 1999) a worker has the statutory right to be accompanied at a disciplinary or grievance hearing by a companion of their choice who is either: a paid official of a trade union; an unpaid official of a trade union who is certified as competent to act as a companion, or; another of the employer’s workers.
In the event that the worker’s chosen companion cannot attend the hearing at the time proposed by the employer, the meeting must be postponed for a reasonable amount of time, subject to a limit of five working days…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
A developer can commit the offence of ‘knowingly permitting’ the deposit of waste by its contractor, despite having no knowledge that the deposit was in breach of an environmental permit.
The case of Hershaw and ors v Sheffield City Council is a reminder to employers to be careful about how and what they communicate to their employees.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…