EAT decision in USDAW and others v WW Realisation 1 Ltd (in liquidation) and another
According to press releases issued by the trade union USDAW and law firm Slater & Gordon, the EAT has held that the words ‘at one establishment’ are to be disregarded for the purposes of collective redundancies involving 20 or more employees. The EAT decision has not yet been handed down but is expected shortly (USDAW and others v WW Realisation 1 Ltd (in Liquidation) and another)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
Update on credit developments.
An analysis of the CMA’s recent Crossrail decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?