EAT confirms that restricting occupational pension scheme benefits for civil partners is not contrary to European legislation

In the February 2013 edition of Pensions Pieces, we mentioned a successful case brought by a civil partner against his pension scheme on the basis that it was not providing benefits in respect of his civil partner on an equal footing to those provided under the scheme to a spouse in an opposite-sex marriage and that this was contrary to European equal treatment legislation and the Human Rights Act 1998. The decision has now been overturned by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), which means that, as the law stands, occupational pension schemes can, in relation to any spouses’ benefits they provide, restrict those, for non-contracted-out benefits, so that civil partners are only entitled to benefits in respect of post-5 December 2005 pensionable service…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. 

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • merger deal

    Corporate crunch time: who will triumph at The Lawyer Awards 2014?

    As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014. 

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of lawyers: 860
Jurisdiction: UK
No. of offices: 4
No. of qualified lawyers: 67 (International 50)