Duck, duck, goose? No, says the court — Aereo remains yet another duck
Many jurisdictions around the globe face complex questions resulting from the use of new technologies for internet redistribution of over-the-air linear broadcast signals in a manner that could threaten traditional television.
On 25 June 2014, the US Supreme Court released its opinion in American Broadcasting Companies v Aereo, preserving the pre-Aereo status quo for linear television retransmissions, while at the same time striking a blow to Aereo’s business and leaving significant uncertainty regarding how the law may apply in the future to other innovations and technologies. Similarly, in recent years, TV Catchup (TVC) has caused a comparable debate in the UK and Europe.
The Aereo and TVC cases illustrate a trend across both jurisdictions for the courts to look beyond technical differences between innovative and traditional broadcasters and distribution platforms and instead focus on the service offered to viewers. Effectively such decisions may be summed up by the old cliché ‘if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, then it must be a duck’ (i.e. if it looks like television and works like television, then it must be treated as television)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
A British Columbia judge has considered an employer’s concerns for the safety of replacement workers, in granting an injunction against picketing workers.
Is the PPF levy for your scheme fair? Does it reflect the true risk of the scheme ever becoming a burden to the PPF?
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive