Dubai: amendment of DIFC Arbitration Law
By Brian Boahene
The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) is a separate common law jurisdiction within the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The founding legislation of the DIFC prescribes that financial free zones in the UAE such as the DIFC shall not take any step that may lead to the contravention of any international agreements to which the UAE is or shall be a party. The UAE acceded to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in 2006. Accordingly, the UAE is bound by its obligations under the convention from this date, and as such the laws of its free zones, including those of the DIFC, should also comply with such obligations. However, until the recent amendment, there was a direct inconsistency between the DIFC Arbitration Law No 1 of 2008 and the UAE’s obligations under the New York Convention.
Article II (3) of the New York Convention requires the court of a contracting state to refer a matter to arbitration upon the request of a party, in a matter that is the subject of a valid arbitration agreement, unless it finds that the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed. In contrast, article 13 (1) of the DIFC Arbitration Law had previously only obligated the DIFC court to stay or dismiss an action in favour of an arbitration agreement, where the arbitration was seated in the DIFC — it did not expressly provide for a stay where the arbitration was seated outside of the DIFC. This brought into question the extent to which the DIFC court could stay/dismiss proceedings brought before it that were subject to a foreign arbitration agreement, and two decisions of the DIFC court in 2012 confirmed that article 13 (1) as drafted was inconsistent with the UAE’s obligations under the New York Convention…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
Claimants with contractual claims against a Korean ship operator can go through London courts.
A Dutch ship operating company, SBV, brought claims against a Chinese bank, BOC, for payment under two refund guarantees governed by English law.