Dress codes and discrimination claims
By Nabila Mallick
Dress codes in the workplace are not uncommon. Most employers have a certain standard of dress in the workplace, whether enforced through contractual terms or through customary practices. More recently, we have seen informal advice given by senior solicitors to new female recruits at Berwin Leighton. The advice was addressed specifically at women.
Dress codes can give rise to a number of different types of claims. For example, a Jewish man may feel discriminated against by the restriction on headwear such that he is not permitted to wear his skull cap, a Muslim woman because she can not wear a head cover or body wrap in the workplace or a non-religious woman told that she must wear a high-collar blouse and a skirt not too high above her knee. Then there are more complicated cases where transgender persons may wish to wear skirts of a certain length that allow them to feel more feminine but make others feel uncomfortable by what is exposed. The problem with uniform dress codes for the employer is that you may not be able to apply the policy in a uniform way.
Sex discrimination claims challenging the imposition of a dress codes seem to favour the employer. In Denise v Metropolitan Police Department (2013), a male trainee police officer, had shoulder-length hair, which he kept in a bun. The police force distinguished between men and women, where men were required to wear their hair short and women were required to wear theirs in a bun. The male trainee was asked to cut his hair. He brought a claim for indirect sex discrimination…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
In the first of a series of quarterly round-ups Kathryn Taylor reviews some of the key decisions of the family court, with the emphasis on local authority failings.
The Supreme Court has buried the doubts that arose in UK courts where Sidaway appeared to conflict with later authorities. The case of Montgomery rules.