Door-to-door sales ‘contractors' found to be employers
By Lillian Rizio
This recent decision considers the vexed question of when a worker may be classified as an independent contractor.
This decision confirms that employers should be cautious about engaging independent contractors, particularly where the contractor is an individual. Care needs to be taken in structuring and implementing such arrangements, given the risk of breaching the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).
Sections 44 and 45 of the FW Act prohibit an employer failing to provide employees with benefits to which they are entitled under the National Employment Standards (which contain, among other things, entitlements to annual leave) and any applicable industrial award. Section 357 of the FW Act renders it unlawful for an employer to represent to a worker that the worker’s contract of employment is an independent contracting arrangement. Civil penalties of up to AUS$51,000 (£30,000) for a corporation, or AUS$10,200 (£5,900) for an involved individual, apply for breaches of these provisions…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
High Court decides: liquidators of insolvent landlords can disclaim leases with the effect of extinguishing the tenant’s leasehold interest
In Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited, the majority of the High Court upheld the Victorian Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the liquidators of an insolvent landlord can disclaim a lease.
Queensland recently brought an interlocutory application seeking a declaration that its laws were valid until a court finally determined otherwise.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out