Doing the numbers: EAT assesses compensation for disability discrimination
The claimant in Osei-Adjei v RM Education Ltd, who suffered from dyslexia, started work in January 2010. He was placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP) in May 2010 but was signed off with stress the next month and did not return.
He resigned in February 2011 and claimed unfair constructive dismissal and disability discrimination in the form of a failure to make reasonable adjustments. The latter claim was successful and he was awarded £4,000 for injury to feelings and £10,000 for psychiatric injury. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case dealt with appeals on the compensation.
The claimant argued that he should be entitled to compensation for loss of earnings and vulnerability on the labour market. The EAT agreed with the tribunal that he had not been dismissed and his resignation broke the chain of causation so far as any future loss of earnings was concerned…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump