Does your commercial guarantee bite?
It is common in commercial guarantee agreements for co-guarantors to have joint and several liability, so that each of them become ‘on the hook’, collectively and individually, pursuant to one contractual document.
Dunbar (the bank) had loaned £2,969,000 to a development company to help finance completion of a development site in Sunderland. Part of the bank’s security for its loan was a joint and several guarantee, in a largely standard form, from four individuals including Mr Harvey (the appellant) and a Mr Lenny. The development was unsuccessful and the bank called on all four guarantors to repay the guaranteed sum and interest.
It turned out that Mr Lenny’s signature on the guarantee contract was a forgery and as such he had the bank’s statutory demand against him set aside. Mr Harvey then argued that the existence of the fraud meant that the guarantee, which was one composite document under which liability was expressed to be joint and severable, had never actually come into effect…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Costs and compliance: Mitchell take two — revised guidance for those seeking relief from court sanctions
After eight months of uncertainty and legal angst, the Court of Appeal has clarified the Mitchell guidance.
Walker Morris looks at the immigration changes and what employers need to know.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents