Does the in-house exemption apply to a non-profit organisation?
Case C-574/12 Centro Hospitalar v Eurest Portugal was a case referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) by the Portuguese court. It was a challenge by Eurest to the direct award of a five-year catering contract by Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, a Portuguese public hospital, to the Serviço de Utilização Comum dos Hospitais (SUCH), a non-profit entity. Eurest was a competitor of SUCH and argued that the contract should have been put out to procurement. Centro Hospitalar argued it was covered by the in-house exemption that was established by the Teckal case.
The Teckal case set the rule that a contract does not need to be procured if it is awarded to an entity: over which the contracting authority exercises ‘a control similar to that which it exercises over its own departments’; that has no private sector ownership or control; or that carries out ‘the essential part’ of its activities with the contracting authority. Subsequent case law has 90 per cent as a rule of thumb for the essential part.
This has now been codified in the new Public Procurement Directive, article 12 (although ‘the essential part’ is at least 80 per cent)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
In the recent case of West v Ian Finlay & Associates, the Court of Appeal found that net contribution clauses ‘are by no means unusual’.
The Financial Reporting Council has published changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.