Walker Morris

Does the in-house exemption apply to a non-profit organisation?

Case C-574/12 Centro Hospitalar v Eurest Portugal was a case referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) by the Portuguese court. It was a challenge by Eurest to the direct award of a five-year catering contract by Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, a Portuguese public hospital, to the Serviço de Utilização Comum dos Hospitais (SUCH), a non-profit entity. Eurest was a competitor of SUCH and argued that the contract should have been put out to procurement. Centro Hospitalar argued it was covered by the in-house exemption that was established by the Teckal case.

The Teckal case set the rule that a contract does not need to be procured if it is awarded to an entity: over which the contracting authority exercises ‘a control similar to that which it exercises over its own departments’; that has no private sector ownership or control; or that carries out ‘the essential part’ of its activities with the contracting authority. Subsequent case law has 90 per cent as a rule of thumb for the essential part.

This has now been codified in the new Public Procurement Directive, article 12 (although ‘the essential part’ is at least 80 per cent)…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.

Briefings from Walker Morris

View more briefings from Walker Morris

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Kings Court
12 King Street