Does repudiation apply to general partnerships? In short: no
When the actions of one partner mean it is not reasonably practicable for a second partner to carry on in business with him, the partnership must come to an end by mutual agreement but the second partner may sue for breach of contract. The High Court’s recent decision in Golstein v Bishop  EWHC 881 (Ch) confirms that, as a matter of law, it is not possible for a breach to be repudiatory in a partnership context, even where the partnership consists of only two partners. It remains to be seen how this principle applies to LLPs and further case law is required in that regard.
Due to the financial crisis, the solicitors’ practice in which Mr Golstein and Mr Bishop were the sole partners fell on hard times. Mr Golstein was contractually guaranteed a salary for himself and his wife (one of the partnership’s secretaries) of £120,000. His billings fell well short of this target and from 1 September 2008 onwards Mr Golstein agreed to reduce his salary by half. However, there was a genuine misunderstanding between the two partners as to whether this was a temporary arrangement to assist cashflow or a permanent reduction. The dispute became acrimonious and the partnership came to an end on 30 June 2010.
The crucial question was how the partnership came to an end. Mr Golstein claimed it terminated either under a clause of the partnership agreement or following his acceptance of Mr Bishop’s cumulative breaches, which had the effect of a repudiatory breach. These breaches included the reduced payment to Mr Golstein, excluding Mr Golstein from the management of the partnership and accounting malpractice for which Mr Bishop was subsequently fined £5,000 by the Solicitors’ Regulatory Authority. Mr Bishop claimed the partnership terminated by mutual agreement…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
This article considers the scope of this rule and provides a checklist of the key points taxpayers should consider to benefit from this rule and avert future charges.
The most significant change introduced by the CDM Regulations 2015 was the creation of the new role of the ‘principal designer’.