Does a dishonouring LC bank have title to sue under an indorsed bill of loading?
On one level, Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG(2) Limited (Erin Schulte)  concerns a technical issue in relation to the application of s.5(2)(b) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 (COGSA 1992), in particular, the circumstances in which ‘a person with possession of the bill as a result of the completion, by delivery of the bill, of any indorsement of the bill’ has title to sue under a bill of lading.
However, the wider issue addressed in this case is the question of what rights a bank that issues a letter of credit (an LC Bank) has in respect of the cargo represented by bills of lading indorsed to it in the context of a presentation under the letter of credit, in circumstances in which the LC Bank dishonours the credit. It is suggested that Mr Justice Teare’s judgment in this case gives rise to a number of concerns for parties presenting indorsed bills of lading under letters of credit.
On another level, it emphasises the risks to traders in issuing letters of indemnity (LOIs) in respect of discharge of cargo without presentation of bills of lading, a practice that is common in the oil business…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
Court of Appeal reverses 20-year service life warranty decision following the Robin Rigg grouting failures
MT Højgaard is not responsible for the cost of remedial work to the grouted connections of the foundations at the Robin Rigg offshorewind farm, overturning last year’s first instance decision.
Affected parties must think about who will be the ’operator’ for the purposes of the new European regulations.