DKF and Wierzbowski Eversheds defence and security networking meeting: discussion of the new Offset Act
On 30 June–1 July 2014, together with the Deutsches Kompensations Forum, we held a defence and security networking meeting in Warsaw. On 26 June 2014, the Polish Parliament adopted a new Offset Act (the Act on Certain Agreements Concluded in Connection with Contracts Essential for National Security), and thus the timing of the conference could not have been better. And just as our conference started, the Polish Armaments Inspectorate announced that Raytheon and MBDA had qualified for the final stage of the Midrange Antiaircraft and Antimissile Air Defence System procurement (the Vistula Program), worth about €6bn (£4.75bn). The conference was an ideal place to congratulate the successful competitors. In my reflections, I would like to share my thoughts on the main topics that raised concerns about the new Offset Act: application, scope of offset, performance security and penalties.
The new Offset Act was signed into law by the president of Poland on 7 July 2014 and will come into force 14 days after publication in the Journal of Laws. It is expected that this will happen within the next two months. Consequently, the Vistula Program may be the first where the new Offset Act will be applicable. Under article 34 of the new Offset Act, in the case of offset agreements concluded before the new Offset Act enters into force, the old Offset Act (the Act on Certain Compensating Agreements Concluded in Connection with Supply Agreements for the Needs of Defence and State Security of 10 September 1999) will continue to apply. The old Offset Act will also apply to amendments of offset agreements concluded before the new Offset Act enters into force but amended after the new Offset Act enters into force. The old Offset Act will also apply to procedures for conclusion of an offset agreement commenced before the new Offset Act enters into force.
Consequently, the new Offset Act will apply only to offset agreements concluded under proceedings commenced after the new Offset Act enters into force…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Case supports the view that a claim for breach of statutory duty is possible in relation to a contract award by a public body beyond the scope of the procurement regulations.
Tools that can be used to: minimise the risk of disputes; formulate and respond to claims; and resolve disputes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all