Dispute resolution: Jersey and the Channel Islands
Litigation is the main form of dispute resolution used in Jersey to settle large commercial disputes. Arbitration is not yet used frequently despite the passing of the
Arbitration (Jersey) Law 1998, which provides a legal framework for arbitration and gives effect to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
The island’s government has, in addition, made a contribution towards the running costs of the City Disputes Panel, which operates in London, with a view to encouraging dispute resolution using that body.
There is no obligation upon parties to pursue alternative dispute resolution (ADR) under the Royal Court Rules (RCR), although a party can be penalised on costs if they unreasonably refuse to mediate…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
The Cayman Islands’ Grand Court (Amendment) Law 2014 introduces the legislative clarification of the law providing for interim relief in aid of foreign proceedings.
The Court of Appeal has considered whether an employee who was unwilling to work out his notice period could treat the contract as at an end and work for a competitor.