Dismissals for rejection of harmonised terms were automatically unfair
The Court of Appeal has upheld the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision that while the harmonisation of terms post TUPE transfer can be for an economic, technical or organisational (ETO) reason, it does not entail ‘changes to the workforce’. This is even where the harmonisation is carried out as part of a wider programme of cost-saving measures, including a number of redundancies, and is specifically being carried out to avoid further job losses. As such, the dismissal of two transferred employees on the grounds of their refusal to accept the new terms and conditions was automatically unfair. The court also upheld the EAT’s decision to award the unfairly dismissed employees re-engagement, notwithstanding that they had already signed up to the harmonised terms, albeit under protest (Hazel and another v The Manchester College).
This case arose in relation to the now deleted TUPE regulation 7(1)(b), which stated that a TUPE-connected dismissal would be automatically unfair, unless it was for an ETO reason, which also entailed ‘changes to the workforce’. It has been established in past case law that changes require a change in the numbers of the workforce or their functions, and that the mere harmonisation of terms with the transferee’s existing workforce is not sufficient…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Court of Appeal in has considered the effect of a lease provision requiring a repeat guarantee as a condition of landlord’s consent on intragroup assignment.
Welcome to the latest edition of Addleshaw Goddard’s Employee Incentives Update, which contains a round-up of key developments in this area during August 2014.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.