Dismissal for gross misconduct is not automatically reasonable
In what might seem at first glance a wholly counterintuitive judgment, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held in Brito-Babapulle v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust UKEAT/0358/12 that where an employer has found an employee to have committed gross misconduct, it is not automatically reasonable to dismiss that employee. Mitigating factors might mean that dismissal was not reasonable.
A dismissal of a qualifying employee will be unfair unless the employer is able to show that the dismissal was for a potentially fair reason (which includes misconduct) and that in all the circumstances the employer acted reasonably in treating that reason as a sufficient reason for dismissal. Section 98(4)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 also requires that the fairness of a dismissal ‘shall be determined in accordance with equity and the substantial merits of the case’.
Ms Brito-Babapulle was employed as a consultant haematologist at Ealing Hospital. She had both private and NHS patients and, while certified sick in respect of her NHS duties from 13 March to 8 June 2009, she continued to treat private patients. She had been warned twice in 2007 in relation to the same kind of misconduct…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
There are now a number of government-backed schemes in existence with the intention of making home ownership more affordable and accessible to the general public.
A court has held that in certain circumstances a collateral warranty may be a ‘construction contract’ that brings with it the requirements of the Construction Act.