Disharmony over KitKat shape mark
By Roland Mallinson
While we have a harmonised trademark law in the EU, it does not always lead to the same results everywhere. We are reminded of this by the recent conflicting decisions of OHIM and the UKIPO concerning the registrability of Nestlé’s KitKat shape, which has been in use for 75 years. Mars had opposed the UK application and applied to cancel the CTM registration.
Although OHIM’s Board of Appeal found in favour of Nestlé, the UKIPO favoured Mars and held the shape to be unregistrable. This was on the grounds that the essential features of the shape serve a technical function and result from the nature of the goods themselves. In concluding this, the UK decision reads more like a patent judgment than a trademark one, with nuanced references to angles of trapezoidal sides ranging between 8° and 14°, minimum depths of grooves and matters of production efficiency…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
The Düsseldorf Court of Appeal has referred questions to the CJEU on whether the supply of patent-protected substances by a third party to a generic company is covered by the Bolar exemption.
This is only the second time that the Data Protection Index has featured in Global Intellectual Property Index, yet a number of trends are already apparent from the results.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town