Discussion clauses — court may force a friendly discussion
Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Limited  EWHC 2104 (Comm)
- Emirates Trading Agency (Emirates) agreed to buy iron ore from Prime Mineral Exports (PME) but failed to collect all the order.
- PME claimed liquidated damages of $1.5m (£892,800).
- Following a similar experience the next year, PME terminated the contract and claimed liquidated damages of $45m, threatening arbitration if not paid within 14 days.
- Six months later an arbitration was commenced by PME.
- The parties had conducted several discussions (both prior to and after termination) with Emirates seeking to get PME to withdraw the termination, without a resolution…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
The most important advantage of international arbitration is the enforceability of its result, as a deal is only as reliable as the mechanism by which it can be made legally enforceable.
The Court of Appeal decision in CLP Holding Company Ltd v Singh (1) Kaur (2) prompts consideration of a common oversight in dealing with dilapidations claims.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe