Disclosure of spent convictions
By Yvonne Gallagher
The Supreme Court has confirmed that the government’s changes to the criminal records disclosure regime last year were necessary. It held that the previous requirement of the blanket disclosure of spent convictions or cautions for minor offences in criminal records checks was a breach of the right to respect for private life.
The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 provides that, subject to certain exceptions, the convictions of those who have not re-offended during a specified period are ‘spent’. Spent convictions do not need to be disclosed to potential employers, and employees cannot be held liable for a failure to disclose them.
There are exemptions where convictions are never spent and must be disclosed. This includes where they relate to specified professions (such as solicitors) and to working with children and vulnerable adults…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Court of Appeal confirms no English celebrity image right but Topshop’s Rihanna T-shirt was passing off
The Court of Appeal has delivered its decision in the litigation between Rihanna and Topshop, upholding the trial judge’s finding that Topshop’s unauthorised use of Rihanna’s image on a T-shirt was passing off.
Prohibition notices are serious enforcement measures that form part of the recipient’s criminal record and can be costl