Disability discrimination and reasonable adjustments to sickness absence policies
HR professionals often have to grapple with the question of whether to discount sickness absences for disabled employees in order to avoid falling foul of the duty under the Equality Act to make reasonable adjustments.
This is particularly so when common viral infections such as colds and flu are exacerbated by a disability such as asthma. In this case, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) states that there are ‘two approaches’ that an employer can take when applying a sickness absence policy to make allowances for employees whose disability increases their chances of contracting other ‘ordinary ailments’.
Mrs Whiteley suffered from asthma and, from January to October 2010, had 54 days’ sickness absence, 41 of which were due to ‘acute upper respiratory tract infections’. HMRC’s sickness absence policy was triggered when an employee took more than 10 days’ absence in a rolling 12-month period. HMRC discounted the days’ absence it took into account from 14 to 10 to make an allowance for Whiteley’s disability but this still triggered the policy so she was issued with a warning. The employment tribunal agreed with Whiteley that HMRC had failed to make reasonable adjustments by not discounting all the absences due to a viral infection…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
A representor has been held liable for its negligent misrepresentation to another party other than the party that was later induced to conclude the contract.
A misrepresentation is a statement that induces entry into a contract and that turns out to be false.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents