Disability and reasonable adjustments: is EAT wrong to say no cut-off time limit for making a claim?
By Michal Stein
Until recently, it was settled law that an employee who wanted to bring a claim for breach of his or her employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments in respect of disabled employees had to do so within three months of the date on which the employer’s final decision is communicated to the employee. An extension could only be granted if a tribunal considered this ‘just and equitable’. An employer’s decision (which amounted to a failure to comply with the duty), said the Court of Appeal, was a one-off omission and time began to run from the date the decision was made.
An Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision has muddied the water and requires employers to review their approach to the duty to make adjustments. In essence, the EAT suggests that employees will be able to bring claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments for up to three months after the end of the employment as the duty to make reasonable adjustments is ongoing — Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) v Jamil …
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
Choosing the right adjudicator to decide your dispute can be one of the most important and difficult aspects of the adjudication process.
In this case, the court considered a payment of funds into court as an alternative remedy to specific performance to deliver security documentation.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem