Directors take care: new guidelines to help interpret two of the Companies Act statutory duties of directors
By Susan Way
We now have recent guidelines to help interpret two of the Companies Act statutory duties of directors: the s172 duty to promote the success of the company and the s171 duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which they were conferred.
In Hellard & Ors v Carvalho, the claimants were the liquidators of an insolvent company previously run by Mr Carvalho (C), its principal director. They brought proceedings under the ‘misfeasance’ procedure of the Insolvency Act 1986 for breach of duties and sought financial relief against C.
The judge found that C chose which creditors to pay and which to leave exposed to the real risk (as it turned out) of being left high and dry. It probably didn’t help C’s case that the payments included repayment of debts owed to his father, payments made to himself and to companies personally controlled by him and Christmas bonuses made to a key employee…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Employers can question an applicant about their criminal record but this is subject to a fairly complex regime intended to protect certain individuals and enable them to be rehabilitated.
The appeal against the High Court’s ruling of JW Spear & Sons Ltd, Mattel Inc and Mattel UK Limited v Zynga Inc was decided recently – what does the decision mean for brand owners?
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…