Designs and models: ECJ advocate-general clarifies the notion of individual character
On 2 April 2014, advocate-general Wathelet issued his opinion in the case C-345/13, Karen Millen Fashions v Dunnes Stores. Following a preliminary ruling request from the Irish Supreme Court, the advocate-general was called to express its opinion as to the interpretation of the notion of individual character set under article 6 of Regulation no.6/2002.
In the underlying case, Karen Millen brought proceedings against Dunnes stores (an Irish retail company) claiming that a black knit top, a blue shirt and a brown shirt offered for sale by the latter under the ‘Savida’ label in 2006 infringed its unregistered community designs of garments offered for sale in Ireland in 2005.
In its opinion, the advocate-general clarified ‘that, in order for a design to be regarded as having individual character, the overall impression which that design produces on the informed user must be different from that produced on such user by one or more earlier designs taken individually, rather than by a combination of features drawn from several designs previously made available to the public’…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
Advocate-general Pedro Cruz Villalón of the European Court of Justice has ruled on the nature and meaning of the concept of parody.
EU Court of Justice rules against referral to pre-determined percentages relating to the degree of recognition of the mark
The EU Court of Justice recently had the opportunity to clarify a set of crucial issues regarding the distinctive character of colour marks.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms