Deregulation Bill — a change of direction for rights of way?
The Deregulation Bill was laid before Parliament in January this year. The bill is part of the government’s Red Tape Challenge, the aim of which is to reduce the burden of regulation. The bill will go some way to achieving that aim by amending or repealing 182 pieces of legislation. From a real-estate perspective, some of the most interesting amendments are those that will affect public rights of way.
The bill proposes a raft of amendments to legalisation affecting rights of way. Of these, the amendments to the Highways Act 1980 (HA) have attracted the most attention. A report in The Times on 2 January 2014 suggested that the amendments would have the effect of granting landowners an ability to divert public rights of way, a statement that, while based in truth, is somewhat over-simplifying the reality of the proposals.
Powers already exist permitting landowners and land managers to apply to a local authority to make an order to either divert or close a public path crossing their land; as such, the changes to the HA do not really introduce any new law. What they do, however, is introduce new provisions dealing with rights of application and appeal…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
When considered practically, the logical approach would be that a property is worth however much people are prepared to pay for it.
The degree and object of annexation were the key principles for the High Court to consider in the recent case of Lictor Anstalt v Mir Steel UK Ltd and Libala Ltd.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.