Deprivation of liberty: current approach leaves vulnerable clients with limited protection
By Laura Davidson
In P and Q v Surrey County Council & Others  EWCA Civ 190, the Court of Appeal approved Parker J’s suggested new ‘relative normality’ test for assessing whether or not someone was being deprived of their liberty.
If someone’s disabilities and difficulties necessitate assistance that is a significant interference in their life regardless of where they reside, then they are living a relatively normal life ‘for them’. Thus the circumstances are unlikely to amount to a deprivation.
This concept purports to emanate from Engel v Netherlands (1976) 1 EHRR 647, despite its focus on the limitations of the army regime upon a soldier’s lifestyle, rather than a person’s individual characteristics…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
Part 4 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill contains a number of important changes to be introduced that seek to prevent judicial review from being a ‘brake on growth’.
No5 Chambers has released the first edition of its Commercial & Chancery Bulletin for 2014.