Definition of shares in a charge did not include rights under Shareholder Loan Agreement
In Fons HF (in liquidation) v Corporal Ltd & anr  EWHC 1801 (Ch), the High Court ruled that the true construction of the standard definition of shares in a charge document did not extend to rights under a shareholder loan agreement.
Such agreements were neither ‘other securities’ nor ‘debentures’ within the definition. This decision emphasises the importance of precise drafting to ensure that charge documents clearly identify all of the property caught by them and highlights the pitfalls for a lending party if this is not the case.
The claimant Fons HF (Fons) purchased shares in the first defendant Corporal Ltd (Corporal). In October 2007 and February 2008 respectively, Fons provided funding to Corporal under two shareholder loan agreements (SLAs)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Fondazione Enasarco v Lehman Brothers Finance is an important decision in the context of characterising which claims will fall as insolvency-derived claims.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe
Why has Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) decided to walk away from the Singapore qualifying foreign law practice (QFLP) scheme?