Definition of shares in a charge did not include rights under Shareholder Loan Agreement
In Fons HF (in liquidation) v Corporal Ltd & anr  EWHC 1801 (Ch), the High Court ruled that the true construction of the standard definition of shares in a charge document did not extend to rights under a shareholder loan agreement.
Such agreements were neither ‘other securities’ nor ‘debentures’ within the definition. This decision emphasises the importance of precise drafting to ensure that charge documents clearly identify all of the property caught by them and highlights the pitfalls for a lending party if this is not the case.
The claimant Fons HF (Fons) purchased shares in the first defendant Corporal Ltd (Corporal). In October 2007 and February 2008 respectively, Fons provided funding to Corporal under two shareholder loan agreements (SLAs)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Sylvia Kierszenbaum and Willem Van de Wiele have authored an article in The International Capital Markets Review.
The Provincial Court of Madrid has upheld a hybrid dispute resolution clause. The judgment is the first one in Spain that recognises the validity of hybrid arbitration clauses.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Advisers get stuck into the disentangling task, to unhitch troubled bank from group
Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers