Defamation Act 2013 — Taylor Wessing analysis
The Defamation Act 2013 was enacted on 25 April 2013. This note discusses the likely practical implications of the act. In summary, the act shifts the balance, between free speech and the right to reputation, in favour of free speech. In some areas this shift is likely to be significant (for example, the hurdle for companies wishing to sue for libel); in other areas there may be little change in practice (for example, the truth defence).
Under the 2013 Act, “a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant.”
The first question is whether section 1 gives a new definition to ‘defamatory’ or whether it is setting an additional requirement for a claimant to prove, on top of the existing examples of defamatory meaning. In our view, the serious harm requirement is additional to the existing definitions of defamatory meaning…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
When considering whether a sign ‘consists exclusively of the shape of goods that is necessary to obtain a technical result’, the court is not confined to looking at the sign as filed.
Iceland Foods applied to register in the UK the trademark ICELAND (both figurative and word marks) for fish, meat, game and poultry.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town