Decision time: employer couldn’t rely on occupational health’s view of disability
The issue in Gallop v Newport City Council was ‘what is required for an employer to have knowledge of an employee’s disability?’ An employer cannot be found to have discriminated (except in certain indirect discrimination cases) unless it knew (or should have known) that the employee was suffering from a disability.
The employee was off work for extended periods between 2005 and 2008 with work-related stress; his GP had since 2006 identified him as having depression. But the employer’s external occupational health advisers gave repeated advice that, despite having a stress-related illness, the employee was not disabled within the meaning of the statutory definition.
The claimant was eventually dismissed in 2008 and claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The tribunal and EAT both decided that the employer was entitled to rely on the views of its medical advisers and could not reasonably be expected to know that the employee was disabled. On that basis, his claims that he had suffered direct disability discrimination and that the council had failed to make reasonable adjustments for him failed…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump