Dealing with vexatious employment tribunal litigants
It is anyone’s guess how many vexatious employment tribunal litigants there are. Their prevalence has been used to justify the planned introduction of tribunal fees; there is at least one website service enabling respondents to search against a serial litigant database. Advisers facing this issue should be aware of the various options available.
One or more applications can be made for: (i) strike-out; (ii) a costs order; (iii) a High Court CRO; or (iv) an RPO following an application by the Attorney General. A complaint of harassment may also be an option.
In 2011–12, 186,300 claims were brought in the employment tribunal. Of these, 59,200 were pursued by individual claimants. In broad terms, 13 per cent of all jurisdictional complaints were struck out — some, no doubt, for being brought or pursued vexatiously or unreasonably…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
Choosing the right adjudicator to decide your dispute can be one of the most important and difficult aspects of the adjudication process.
In this case, the court considered a payment of funds into court as an alternative remedy to specific performance to deliver security documentation.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem