DC District Court applies Christian Doctrine, upholds hospitals as subcontractors subject to OFCCP anti-discrimination provisions
In a significant decision with implications beyond the healthcare industry, the DC District Court upheld a ruling by the US Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) deeming three Pennsylvania hospitals’ government subcontractors subject to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs’ (OFCCP’s) jurisdiction - UPMC Braddock v Harris, No. 1:09-cv-01210-PLF (DDC 30 March 2013).
The hospitals had each agreed to offer medical products and services to federal employees through UPMC Health Plan (HMO). The HMO was itself under contract with the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Despite express agreement with the HMO that, as providers of medical services, the hospitals were not federal subcontractors covered by mandatory equal employment opportunity and auditing regulations, the court found otherwise and invalidated the contract provision.
The issue decided by the court first arose in 2004 and follows a recent OFCCP trend of broadly expanding its jurisdiction over potential subcontractors. Initially, based on the HMO’s contract with OPM, the Department of Labor determined that UPMC Braddock, UPMC McKeesport and UPMC Southside (the hospitals) qualified as federal subcontractors. Denying this status, the hospitals refused to comply with OFCCP’s request for a compliance review. In response, the OFCCP brought administrative enforcement proceedings against the hospitals and won judgments before an ALJ in 2006 and the ARB in 2008, which the hospitals appealed to the DC District Court…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump