Database right: where have we got to?
The Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations 1997 came into force on 1 January 1998, implementing the EU Database Directive. Since the regulations came into force, the courts have been asked on several occasions to clarify the scope of the new database right. This article considers those landmark decisions.
Database right subsists in a database if there has been ‘a substantial investment in obtaining, verifying or presenting the contents of the database’ (regulation 13 of the regulations). In British Horseracing Board Ltd v William Hill Organisation Ltd, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) clarified that the phrase ‘invested in obtaining the contents’ refers to resources that are used to find existing independently created materials and to collect them as a database; it does not cover the resources used to create the materials that sit within the database. This means that the sui generis right does not extend protection to databases compiled by organisations that, as part of their functions, create the original data contained in their databases.
This decision has had particular ramifications for sports companies that create databases, which may originate the data within their databases but which may not need to seek out the data or verify them. For instance, in Football Dataco Ltd v Yahoo! UK Ltd, the ECJ found no sui generis right in a database of football fixture lists, as the database was composed of data created by and exclusively available from the database owner. Conversely, in Football Dataco Ltd v Stan James plc and Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH, the Court of Appeal, upholding the High Court, held that factual data that was recorded at a live football match was not created by that person and the data in the database represented a ‘considerable investment’ that was capable of protection by the sui generis right…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Jackson, Denton, Mitchell… anyone involved with civil litigation over the last two years will have heard these names repeatedly and will be aware of their importance to compliance with the new rules.
While a headline glance at the Supreme Court’s judgment in this long-running case might give developers some encouragement a closer look reveals that the issues in play are not quite so straightforward.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.