Data Protection Update — June 2013
Welcome to the June edition of Stephenson Harwood’s Data Protection Update, a monthly bulletin on key developments in data protection law.
This edition reports on the continuing saga of the EU DP Regulation where the prospect of a new law being passed before EU elections next May looks even more unlikely. The firm also looks into the OFT report on personalised pricing as it seeks further transparency around data collection and exploitation. In what has been a busy month for the ICO, Stephenson Harwood also comments on the monetary penalty the ICO has issued to Glasgow City Council and the penalty notices it has issued for cold calling. Lastly, the firm revisits the plight of Google and the concerted action being taken against the internet giant by the EU DP Regulators…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s litigation reporter looks at the ongoing saga of the Tchenguiz litigation
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe