King & Wood Mallesons

Asia-Pacific 100 position: 2

Crystal ball gazing — privilege and anticipation of litigation

Last July we reported on the decision of Justice Cowdroy in the Federal Court upholding insurers’ claim for privilege over the reports of loss adjusters. That decision was important for insurers dealing with large and complex claims as the nature of such claims may be sufficient to support a reasonable anticipation of litigation very soon after an insured event occurs.

The Full Federal Court has now reinforced that first instance decision in a decision delivered immediately before Christmas (Ensham Resources v Aioi Insurance Company [2012] FCAFC 191). The insured’s appeal was dismissed and the court’s reasons are now, arguably, the leading decision on the issue of privilege and loss adjuster’s reports…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Level 61, Governor Phillip Tower
1 Farrer Place
NSW 2000

Jurisdiction: PRC/Australia
No. of offices: 19
No. of qualified lawyers: 1,634