Criminal parallel proceedings — when is it appropriate for parties to postpone?
By Naomi Owen
This article considers the pros and cons of applying for a postponement when criminal proceedings are pending.
There are numerous reasons that may lead one or both parties to seek a postponement of a final hearing in the Employment Tribunal. One such reason is where criminal proceedings are running in parallel. On the strict interpretation of the law, there is no reason why the cases cannot continue in tandem, as the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided in the case of Firouzan v Mtreoline Travel Ltd UKEAT/0233/12/CEA.
However, the practical implications may dictate otherwise — for example…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
$5m suit may succeed if fans can prove boxer failed to disclose an injury.
There’s less Employment Tribunal advocacy work around now, but one area developing fast is investigations.