No5 Chambers

Bar top 30 position: 6=

Criminal parallel proceedings — when is it appropriate for parties to postpone?

By Naomi Owen

This article considers the pros and cons of applying for a postponement when criminal proceedings are pending.

There are numerous reasons that may lead one or both parties to seek a postponement of a final hearing in the Employment Tribunal. One such reason is where criminal proceedings are running in parallel. On the strict interpretation of the law, there is no reason why the cases cannot continue in tandem, as the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided in the case of Firouzan v Mtreoline Travel Ltd UKEAT/0233/12/CEA.

However, the practical implications may dictate otherwise — for example…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. 

Briefings from No5 Chambers

  • Holiday pay has to include commission

    In Lock v British Gas, the European Court of Justice decided that holiday pay under the Working Time Directive has to include commission if salary is made up of commission.

  • Understanding serious brain injury

    At any time, as those who have suffered a serious injury to the brain or have been close to someone who has will know, your life can be turned upside down in less than a fated second.

View more briefings from No5 Chambers


Fountain Court
Steelhouse Lane
B4 6DR

Silks: 26
Juniors: 213
Head of chambers: Paul Bleasdale QC
Practice director: Tony McDaid
Office manager: Sandra Astbury