Criminal cartels: can companies be prosecuted?
By Robin Barclay
On 1 April 2014, a new and improved criminal cartel offence will be introduced in the UK by virtue of section 47 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA13). By removing the requirement for an individual to have acted dishonestly in relation to commercial arrangements that involve deliberate price fixing, market sharing, bid rigging and limiting output, the new offence should make it easier for the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to launch prosecutions of individuals involved in prohibited hardcore cartels.
However, by omitting to change the cartel offence so that it embraces corporate criminal liability as well, the question remains: could the CMA or SFO charge a company with cartel crime?
At first blush the answer is ‘no’, owing to the fact that the cartel offence, as created by section 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EA02), applies to individuals and not companies. On this basis therefore so far as principal offenders go, commercial organisations and companies cannot be prosecuted because that was parliament’s intention…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Outer Temple Chambers briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Outer Temple Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Outer Temple Chambers
The Supreme Court on 11 March 2015 handed down a unanimous judgment that confirms that the Bolam test does not apply to a doctor’s duty to warn patients of the risks of treatment.
An important judgment has been handed down that deals with the remedies available to members of the IBM Project Waltz scheme.