CRAR: a new system for the recovery of commercial property rent arrears is now in force
By Deborah Rider
As of 6 April 2014 and as part of wider reforms introduced by the government, the ancient common law right of distress for rent has now been abolished and replaced by a new statutory procedure known as commercial rent arrears recovery or CRAR.
The common law regime of distress was a self-help remedy previously available to landlords whose tenants had fallen behind in the payment of rent, allowing them to enter the leased premises and seize and sell goods up to the value of the monies owed, with no prior warning and no court order required. Although this was a quick, effective and inexpensive remedy for landlords, it was considered to be too draconian for tenants, as a result of which the decision has now been made to abolish this right and implement a new regime.
CRAR only applies to commercial leases evidenced in writing where no part of the premises is lawfully used as a residential dwelling. Mixed-use premises with a residential element are excluded…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Goodman Derrick
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
This note is relevant to office holders who have, or may have, claims that, prior to April 2015, they ought — or wish — to bring against any third party.
The Court of Appeal has twice this year given judgments in the case Coventry and others v Lawrence and another, first in February and more recently in July.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Active financial management is vital, but with firms looking more closely at the process of debt and fee collection, the personal touch still counts
The lure of the law can kick in at any stage of life. We speak to four individuals who have made a radical switch to a legal career