Court of Appeal victory for Mills & Reeve in SDLT shared equity case
In 2006, a professor bought a house in London with assistance from the college that employed him. This was a ‘shared equity’ scheme that Mills & Reeve helped to pioneer many years ago, and that is now widely used across the sector.
There are many variants to the scheme but basically the employer contributes part of the purchase price and takes a proportionate share in the equity. Usually, the staff member has the opportunity to buy out the institution in the future.
The college is of course a charity and expected to claim SDLT charities relief on its equity share. Unfortunately, the professor’s solicitors, who were responsible for making the SLDT return, wrote to HM Revenue & Customs to ask its opinion. It responded that the college was not entitled to charities relief, because it had bought the house jointly with the professor…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why