Court of Appeal says requirement to work on some Sundays justified
The Court of Appeal has confirmed a tribunal decision that required a committed Christian to work on a Sunday on an occasional basis in accordance with her contract of employment was objectively justified and did not discriminate against her because of her religion and belief.
Commenting on the decision in Mba v London Borough of Merton, Hogan Lovells’ employment partner, Elizabeth Slattery, said: ‘Certainly at Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) level this case was reported as meaning that Christians have no right to refuse to work on a Sunday. This is not correct.
‘What the Court of Appeal decision makes clear, as the EAT decision did before it, is that cases of this nature are extremely fact sensitive. Tribunals must balance the impact of the practice or policy (here a requirement to work on occasional Sundays) on the employee against the importance of the employer’s reasons for implementing it. In this case, the employer had given careful consideration to the issue in advance and was able to explain why it needed the employee to work on an occasional Sunday. These reasons were sufficiently cogent to persuade the tribunal that the policy was justified, despite its impact on the employee. This does not set a precedent for future cases, which will depend on their own facts’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump