Court of Appeal refers the ‘Woolworths’ case to the CJEU
In July 2013, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) controversially held that all the employees made redundant from two insolvent retail businesses were entitled to be collectively consulted once the overall number of redundancies had reached 20 or more, regardless of where the employees worked.
In reaching this decision, the EAT decided that the words ‘at one establishment’ were to be deleted from section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRA) in order to give effect to the EU Collective Redundancies Directive (No.98/59).
The secretary of state for business, innovation and skills was not represented at the EAT hearing and did not submit written representations. As the government would be responsible for the cost of the protective awards (as the retail businesses were insolvent), they elected to appeal the decision to the Court of Appeal…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
This month’s roundup of developments affecting banks, wealth managers, brokers and funds.
Delay is a common problem in construction projects and can have costly implications. Before electing to terminate on grounds of contractor delay, there are a number of factors that should be considered.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?