Court of Appeal considers identity, capacity and loss
The question of whether a party has entered into a contractual arrangement as principal for itself or as agent for another entity can be pivotal in a contractual claim. The issue may be raised as a defence, for example, where a defendant is trying to argue that the claimant individual has not suffered the requisite loss and therefore that the claim has no teeth even if liability is made out.
Alternatively it may be raised where a defendant is trying to escape contractual liability by sheltering behind an entity with which the claimant in fact has the contractual nexus. These issues were at the centre of Muneer Hamid (t/a Hamid Properties) v Francis Bradshaw Partnership  EWCA Civ 470…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Fondazione Enasarco v Lehman Brothers Finance is an important decision in the context of characterising which claims will fall as insolvency-derived claims.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe
Why has Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) decided to walk away from the Singapore qualifying foreign law practice (QFLP) scheme?