Court of Appeal considers identity, capacity and loss
The question of whether a party has entered into a contractual arrangement as principal for itself or as agent for another entity can be pivotal in a contractual claim. The issue may be raised as a defence, for example, where a defendant is trying to argue that the claimant individual has not suffered the requisite loss and therefore that the claim has no teeth even if liability is made out.
Alternatively it may be raised where a defendant is trying to escape contractual liability by sheltering behind an entity with which the claimant in fact has the contractual nexus. These issues were at the centre of Muneer Hamid (t/a Hamid Properties) v Francis Bradshaw Partnership  EWCA Civ 470…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Sylvia Kierszenbaum and Willem Van de Wiele have authored an article in The International Capital Markets Review.
The Provincial Court of Madrid has upheld a hybrid dispute resolution clause. The judgment is the first one in Spain that recognises the validity of hybrid arbitration clauses.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Advisers get stuck into the disentangling task, to unhitch troubled bank from group
Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers