Court of Appeal cautions employers against blindly accepting an occupational health opinion that employee is not disabled
The Court of Appeal decision in Gallop v Newport City Council highlights the pitfalls of relying blindly on the opinion or report of an occupational health (OH) adviser that an employee is not disabled or not covered by disability discrimination legislation. In this case, the employee had been signed off work with work-related stress. The employer’s OH adviser reported to the employer that he was indeed suffering from stress but that it did not amount to depression or a depressive illness. The employee went on to bring a disability discrimination claim including a claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments. His employer argued that, in view of the OH advice, it could not have had actual or constructive knowledge that he was disabled and therefore the duty to make reasonable adjustments was not engaged…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
When considered practically, the logical approach would be that a property is worth however much people are prepared to pay for it.
The degree and object of annexation were the key principles for the High Court to consider in the recent case of Lictor Anstalt v Mir Steel UK Ltd and Libala Ltd.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.