Court guidance provided on pre-inquest review hearings
In Ernest Andrew Brown v HM Coroner for Norfolk & Chief Constable of Norfolk (interested party), the claimant, Ernest Brown, made an application to the High Court for an order that the inquest verdict on the death of his step-daughter, Joanne Foreman, be quashed and that a fresh coroner’s investigation should be held.
In his application, the claimant set out various reasons why he believed that the original inquest process had not been fairly, honestly or properly conducted. He claimed that the original police investigation that took place into the circumstances of the death was inadequate and, in consequence, the evidence presented to the coroner at the inquest was incomplete and inaccurate. The inquest was conducted upon the general mistaken assumption that the deceased had self-injected insulin, which may have been the cause of her death. But neither the police nor the coroner’s officer drew the coroner’s attention to the findings of the paramedic team, which included an entirely normal blood glucose analysis made at the scene. This fact meant that insulin would have played no significant role in deceased’s death. The claimant was also highly critical of the over-familiarity with and a conversation between the coroner and the investigating police authority.
The High Court granted the application to quash the original inquest verdict and ordered a fresh investigation…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
When considered practically, the logical approach would be that a property is worth however much people are prepared to pay for it.
The degree and object of annexation were the key principles for the High Court to consider in the recent case of Lictor Anstalt v Mir Steel UK Ltd and Libala Ltd.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.