Court gives narrow interpretation to deemed consent and piercing the corporate veil

In Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corp & Ors v Aivars Lembergs [2013] EWCA Civ 730, the Court of Appeal held that the controller of a shell company that had entered into a contract containing a jurisdiction clause was not deemed to have consented to submit to that jurisdiction himself.

The court also followed the recent rulings in VTB Capital and Prest v Petrodel to the effect that the fact that a party used a company it controlled as a façade would not automatically justify piercing the corporate veil. The veil is pierced only when the controller is ‘under an existing legal obligation… which he deliberately evades’.

Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corp chartered a number of vessels to offshore companies that were allegedly controlled by Aivars Lembergs and others. Gramsci alleged that these charterparties were part of a fraudulent scheme to charter the vessels at below-market rates and then sub-charter them at higher rates. The charterparties contained exclusive English jurisdiction clauses…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Allen & Overy

  • ITC reaffirms its power to bar digital file transfers

    The ITC has reaffirmed its power to ban electronic transmissions from the US where those transmissions infringe an intellectual property right or are otherwise based on an unfair trade practice.

  • Changes to French takeover rules

    A new French law, the ‘Law to recapture the real economy’ (‘Loi visant à reconquérir l’économie réelle’ or ‘Loi Florange’), was made on 1 April 2014.

View more briefings from Allen & Overy

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


One Bishops Square
E1 6AD

Turnover (£m): 1,189.00
No. of Lawyers: 2,304
No. of Lawyers (Asia Pacific): 357
Offices (Asia Pacific): 10