Court construes ‘Notices’ provision in GAFTA 64 contract
The decision in Soufflet Negoce SA v Fedcominvest Europe SARL provides helpful guidance on the construction of the ‘Notices’ provision in GAFTA 64 (general contract for grain in bulk FOB terms).
The court upheld the GAFTA Board of Appeal award, which found that the provision in the contract, whereby any notice received after 16:00 hours on a business day would be deemed to have been received the following day, applied only in the case of resales and repurchases (which was not the case here).
The commercial reality is that, in those cases, it is particularly important that notices up or down the chain are served without delay because intermediary sellers or buyers in the chain may otherwise be prejudiced if the notice is not received in time to be passed on…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
A claim brought by Mariah Re is one of few cat bonds to have been triggered, and almost as quickly went into dispute.
The recent judgment in the Longchamp case has overturned accepted industry thinking in how bunkers and crew wages are dealt with in a hijacking.