Cotterill v David Rubin and Partners (C.I) Ltd
On 3 June 2013, the Guernsey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal held that Susan Cotterill had been unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy from Archer Divers Builders Limited, but concluded that it would be ‘just and equitable to use its discretion under Section 3(2) of The Employment Protection (Guernsey) Law 1998, as amended, to reduce the six month award of compensation by 85 per cent’.
In particular, the Tribunal found that there was sufficient reason to reduce the six month compensatory award by 85 per cent on the basis of the ‘cogent evidence presented that the dismissal was for a substantive fair reason’ (being the closure of the business as a whole, now in liquidation)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
The Cayman Islands’ Grand Court (Amendment) Law 2014 introduces the legislative clarification of the law providing for interim relief in aid of foreign proceedings.
The Court of Appeal has considered whether an employee who was unwilling to work out his notice period could treat the contract as at an end and work for a competitor.