Costs and compliance: Mitchell take two — revised guidance for those seeking relief from court sanctions
After eight months of uncertainty and legal angst, the Court of Appeal has clarified the Mitchell guidance and in so doing introduced a fresh approach for those seeking relief from sanctions. No longer is the post-Jackson motto ‘comply, comply, comply’ (or be sanctioned with very little hope of relief). Rather, the Court of Appeal has introduced a three-stage test to encourage a more practical and co-operative approach to compliance by those litigating and a more consistent and just approach by the courts.
A culture of compliance with an occasional, albeit rare, need for court intervention remains the goal. There is also a clear message that there will be costs penalties for those wasting court time with applications that could have been dealt with by agreement and the straightforward appliance of the new three-stage test.
Litigators and judges alike will welcome the clarification, which many hope will reduce considerably the likelihood of disproportionate penalties and decisions. It might even make litigators more willing to co-operate with each other…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Landlords must protect tenants’ deposits and provide tenants with prescribed information, regardless of when the tenancy commenced and when the deposit was received.
In the Yam Seng case, the court was willing to imply a duty of good faith to give business efficacy to a commercial contract. Since that case, the law has been somewhat uncertain.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.