Copyright — nature and meaning of the concept of parody
By the opinions published on 22 May, advocate-general Pedro Cruz Villalón of the European Court of Justice ruled on the nature and meaning of the concept of parody, as defined in Directive 2001/29, in response to questions proposed by the Belgian Court of second instance, indicated below:
- Whether the concept of ‘parody’ is an autonomous concept of the European Union law
- If so, whether a parody has to satisfy the following conditions or conform to the following characteristics: have an own original character (originality); and such that the parody cannot reasonably be ascribed to the author of the original work; be designed to provoke humour or to mock, regardless of whether any criticism thereby expressed applies to the original work or to something or someone else; mention the source of the parodied work
- Whether a work has to satisfy any other conditions or conform to other characteristics in order to be capable of being labelled as a parody…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
In the two kinds of insurance (’loss occurrence’ and ’claims made’), the risk linked to the premium is different.
The ECJ’s recent decision is characterised by a wide interpretation of two constitutive elements of the producer liability for defective product.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms